Drivers first
Formulas live on the accounts finance already owns. Units times price, headcount times salary, cost of sales as a share of revenue — calculated at the detail level, then added up.
Bring in the people who own each assumption. Run scenarios on the forecast you already have. Locked months, approvals and a history on every number make it safe to open the plan to the whole organisation.
Formulas live on the accounts finance already owns. Units times price, headcount times salary, cost of sales as a share of revenue — calculated at the detail level, then added up.
Sales, HR and operations contribute on their own pages, see only their part, and commit and approve in a round. Locked months and a history on every number keep it safe.
Workforce, sales, demand, cash flow and capex models, each with its own drivers. Formulas read across them, so a workforce plan feeds the personnel lines of the profit and loss.
Start from the live forecast, change the assumptions that matter and compare against the base case. No rebuilt model, no second spreadsheet.
Each model carries the dimensions it needs: sales by product and region, workforce by role and entity. Shared definitions underneath bring the results together.
Ask why a line moved, or ask for a formula, a report or a new model. The assistant drafts it with the numbers behind it; a person reviews and publishes. It never changes a figure on its own.
Drive the P&L from operational assumptions and let cash flow and the balance sheet follow from it, so the three statements stay in step.
Plan headcount, hires, leavers and salary changes by role and entity. Personnel costs flow straight into the P&L.
Multi-year plans on the same structure as the annual budget, so long-range targets and this year's forecast can be compared line by line.
Volume, price and mix by product, customer or region, with the actuals alongside to test the assumptions.
Bring sales, operations and finance plans together on one set of numbers, reviewed on one cadence.
Roll pipeline and run-rate into a forecast the sales owners update themselves, with finance seeing every change.
Plan demand by product and location and translate it into inventory and purchasing needs, connected to cash.
Keep Excel. The grid is Excel-style in the browser, and the add-in lets budget owners work in Excel itself, live against the same numbers and the same locks. What you give up is the emailing, the version confusion, the accidental overwrite and not knowing who changed what. What you gain is one model, locked months, approvals and a history on every number.
Quanty's formulas live on your accounts and are edited in a screen rather than written in a modelling language. What a forecast is, where the actuals stop, how spreading works and who may write where are settings. Your controller changes a formula on a Tuesday afternoon.
Each model carries the dimensions it needs: sales might plan by product and region while workforce plans by role and entity. What is shared is the definitions underneath, so an entity or a cost centre means the same thing everywhere and finance can bring the results together. Dimensions are maintained by finance in a screen, not by a developer.
A company with ten budget owners uses Quanty. The question is usually not size but how much of the round is spent reconciling versions rather than discussing the numbers.
If you plan supply chain, sales and finance together across a global enterprise with a dedicated modelling team, another tool may fit better. Ask us and we will tell you honestly.
Data arrives from your source systems through an API connection, or as a CSV or Excel file. Each source is inspected and mapped before it loads, and then loads on a schedule. Every loaded number can be traced back to the source rows it came from.
Workforce, sales, demand, cash flow, capex and scenario models are built in Quanty today, each with its own drivers, and formulas read across them so a workforce plan can feed the personnel lines of the profit and loss. The profit-and-loss model comes with a guided setup; the others are built with you.
Yes. Access is set per group down to the individual member, and it narrows through every layer: application, model, member and approval lock. A formula cannot leak a number the reader is not allowed to see.
It goes through the same consolidation as the actuals: same entities, same ownership, same eliminations and translation. That is what planning and consolidation sharing one platform means in practice.
It explains, or proposes a formula, a report or a model to build. A person reviews and publishes. The calculation engine follows defined rules and every value has a person or a logged process behind it.
One model, locked months, approvals and a history on every number. Tell us about your planning round and we'll show you how it maps.
Get started